I'm well overdue for an update on Cheers Neighbours’ Network. Plans about whose auspices Cheers come under have changed since last time (long story), but there is light on the horizon maybe with Worldview Aus who I now work for. WVA is still finding its organisational feet, and there's no urgency, but it's good to have insurance, childsafe training etc. And the connection between Cheers & Worldview Australia is strong as ever.
0 Comments
Q: How “Christian” should our participation in politics and government be? A: As with any other part of life. How Christianly should we do business, play footy, do our work? We care about policy because policy impacts people. And increasingly, policies are impacting people's moral-spiritual-religious lives. The more government intervenes outside its mandate into the totality of people's worldviews, the more it is our civic and Christian duty to be informed and influential. Q: But since Australia is a "Secular Democracy," shouldn’t Christians stay out of it? A: No - every citizen is allowed to participate, including us. In fact especially us - with a Christian moral reference point, we have a more vital role to play. Alert: If you think “Secular Democracy” excludes religions, you've swallowed the wrong definition… Q: What do we mean by, "Secular Democracy"? Atheist activism? Or, a general Biblical reference point? A1: What some mean by Secular Democracy... Some say that Secular means, “no worldviews allowed that include God,” which only leaves atheism as the remaining worldview. And they say that Democracy means, “the people decide according to the numbers,” whether by better organising or tactics to get those numbers of power. Plainly put, “government participation should be exclusively for practical atheists, elected according to the weight of numbers.” Those who use this meaning include secular humanists, communists, various victim-identity-politics activists. They misuse words about "separation of church and state," and falsely say government schools & agencies are "not allowed to talk about religion." For them God’s ways are repressive. For them freedom means permission to do whatever the self wants whether it harms people or not. They outlaw disagreeing views, eject dissenters, and advance policy by pressure, not persuasion. Lip service is given to debating the facts, but in practice when they gain power they tend to push their policies through using ridicule, and avoid rational debate, preferring Kirk & Madsen’s approach of “Desensitise, Jam, Convert.” It is power by activism, which is why such worldviews are so big on taking over unions and lobbying. A2: What our Constitution means by "Secular Democracy"... At Federation in 1901, Australia’s founders held that Secular meant “anyone can participate, and government is not to be connected to a particular religious institution,” which basically meant you could participate whether Catholic or Anglican, and no church institution was to govern. Democracy meant “a morally literate public deciding within the parameters of a Biblical reference point.” Plainly put, “government participation is inclusively open to anyone, elected according to good reasons within the moral bounds of a Biblical reference point.” A Biblical reference point was seen as a good safeguard against the social decline that could occur without it. This safeguard was not by institutional totalitarianism, but by calling for personal responsibility to God and one’s fellow man. It was widely understood that a personal relationship with God through Christ was the most effective way to become such a responsible person, but Christianity itself also maintains that this faith is to be free, not forced. Therefore the Biblical reference point also safeguarded freedom itself within democracy. Forced conversions are prevented by Biblical Christianity. So fears of a Christian takeover are unfounded and actually best allayed by Christianity itself. And governments find their particular limited authority under God, for law and order, protection, fair organisation and services. Churches find their different scope of authority under God in the spiritual and Biblical compass they help people find. Business bosses are limited to the scope of their businesses. Parents have responsibilities for their families. And individuals for their beliefs and lifestyles. Doesn’t this sound much more sane, than the chaotic over-reaching we have now! Unsurprisingly the Biblical worldview so often represents the sensible centre because it seeks to align with reality - natural law, the Creator’s manual. It separates powers, safeguards freedoms, and is utterly worthy of our collective agreement as our common, good reference point. Everyone should be able to get behind this kind of Secular Democracy. Remember, this is not some wishful interpretation, it's the view of the founders of Australian Federation. This is the intent of the Constitution. Not the twisted redefinition of atheist activists. So we should learn to articulate and advocate for this founding definition. Q: So which definition of Secular Democracy should we use? A: Inclusive participation in Biblically literate, reasoned, decision-making, with separated powers.
If you have not been before, come suss out a Momentum. And if you have been before, you’ll want your friends to hear this info. Ask to be on the mailing list for dates, or check my diary here. You can arrange to host a Momentum near you. That’s how we hope to build, well, momentum. Next March's WA elections, equip yourself to vote Christianly - for Biblical values. Two tips you should know:
|
Categories
All
Archives
November 2024
|